AgileWebs/furniture-service
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
a7ad51c4f6
furniture-service/.tasks/done/TASK-20260222-001.md
José René White Enciso a7ad51c4f6 chore(tasks): close task-20260222-001 
- WHY: complete Stage 3 lifecycle transition for TASK-001
- WHAT: move task from active to done and append completion metadata
- RULE: apply task folder behavior from repository workflow directives
2026-02-22 01:32:31 -06:00

2.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Stage 1 Task

0. Header

  • Task ID: TASK-20260222-001
  • Title: Define furniture-service use-case orchestration boundaries
  • Status: Planned
  • Priority: P1
  • Target Repo: furniture-service
  • Target Branch: feature/furniture-service-001
  • Related Master Plan: plan/master-stage1-structural-normalization-2026-02-22.md
  • Related Mini Plan: plan/furniture-service-mini-plan.md

1. Goal (What and Why)

What

  • Map handlers and ports to explicit orchestration responsibilities
  • Separate workflow orchestration from edge and DAL concerns

Why

  • Service layer must be orchestration-focused and boundary-driven

2. Scope

In Scope

  • Use-case and handler responsibility map

Out of Scope

  • BFF endpoint design or DAL provider behavior

3. Constraints (Non-Negotiable)

  • Stage 1 planning only. No implementation changes.
  • Do not modify any file under legacy.
  • Do not run repo provisioning or CI generation.
  • Follow the approved architecture boundaries and protocol policy.
  • Keep identity abstractions inside Thalos repositories.

4. Documentation Requirement

  • Capture planning decisions clearly for handoff.
  • Identify documentation and diagram updates expected in later stages.

5. Context

  • This task derives from plan/furniture-service-mini-plan.md.
  • This task must remain decision-focused and implementation-ready.

6. Proposed Approach

  • Define clear orchestration boundaries for service workflows

7. Execution Steps

  1. Review legacy evidence relevant to this task scope.
  2. Define target boundary decisions and contract implications.
  3. Record risks, dependencies, and compatibility notes.
  4. Produce clear handoff guidance for implementation stage.

8. Acceptance Criteria

  • Decisions are explicit, scoped, and actionable.
  • Ownership boundaries are unambiguous.
  • Protocol policy alignment is explicit where applicable.
  • No forbidden Stage 1 actions were performed.

9. Testing Plan

Unit Tests

  • Not applicable for Stage 1 planning artifacts.

Validation

  • Ensure consistency with master plan and mini plan.

10. Definition of Done

  • Task content is complete and consistent with other task files.
  • References to master and mini plans are correct.
  • Handoff notes are clear enough for immediate implementation.

11. Risks and Questions

  • Risk: boundary drift during implementation.
  • Mitigation: enforce repo intent metadata and mini plan ownership.

12. Handoff Notes

  • Preserve approved constraints exactly.
  • Implementers should execute this task only after reading master and mini plans.

END OF TASK

13. Completion Metadata

  • Completion Stage: Stage 3 Execution
  • Completed On: 2026-02-22
  • Completed By: Codex
  • Completion Branch: feature/furniture-service-001
  • Completion Commit: 058ba31
  • Lifecycle State: done