AgileWebs/furniture-dal
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
a99e3b9c5c
furniture-dal/.tasks/done/TASK-20260222-001.md
José René White Enciso a99e3b9c5c chore(tasks): close task-20260222-001 
- WHY: complete Stage 3 lifecycle transition for TASK-001
- WHAT: move task from active to done and append completion metadata
- RULE: apply task folder behavior from repository workflow directives
2026-02-22 01:32:30 -06:00

2.7 KiB
Raw Blame History

Stage 1 Task

0. Header

  • Task ID: TASK-20260222-001
  • Title: Define repository and provider boundaries for furniture-dal
  • Status: Planned
  • Priority: P1
  • Target Repo: furniture-dal
  • Target Branch: feature/furniture-dal-001
  • Related Master Plan: plan/master-stage1-structural-normalization-2026-02-22.md
  • Related Mini Plan: plan/furniture-dal-mini-plan.md

1. Goal (What and Why)

What

  • Map provider ownership by aggregate and capability
  • Document repository abstraction responsibilities

Why

  • DAL clarity requires strict provider and repository ownership

2. Scope

In Scope

  • Provider and repository ownership matrix

Out of Scope

  • Service orchestration concerns

3. Constraints (Non-Negotiable)

  • Stage 1 planning only. No implementation changes.
  • Do not modify any file under legacy.
  • Do not run repo provisioning or CI generation.
  • Follow the approved architecture boundaries and protocol policy.
  • Keep identity abstractions inside Thalos repositories.

4. Documentation Requirement

  • Capture planning decisions clearly for handoff.
  • Identify documentation and diagram updates expected in later stages.

5. Context

  • This task derives from plan/furniture-dal-mini-plan.md.
  • This task must remain decision-focused and implementation-ready.

6. Proposed Approach

  • Define aggregate-level provider boundaries and repository roles

7. Execution Steps

  1. Review legacy evidence relevant to this task scope.
  2. Define target boundary decisions and contract implications.
  3. Record risks, dependencies, and compatibility notes.
  4. Produce clear handoff guidance for implementation stage.

8. Acceptance Criteria

  • Decisions are explicit, scoped, and actionable.
  • Ownership boundaries are unambiguous.
  • Protocol policy alignment is explicit where applicable.
  • No forbidden Stage 1 actions were performed.

9. Testing Plan

Unit Tests

  • Not applicable for Stage 1 planning artifacts.

Validation

  • Ensure consistency with master plan and mini plan.

10. Definition of Done

  • Task content is complete and consistent with other task files.
  • References to master and mini plans are correct.
  • Handoff notes are clear enough for immediate implementation.

11. Risks and Questions

  • Risk: boundary drift during implementation.
  • Mitigation: enforce repo intent metadata and mini plan ownership.

12. Handoff Notes

  • Preserve approved constraints exactly.
  • Implementers should execute this task only after reading master and mini plans.

END OF TASK

13. Completion Metadata

  • Completion Stage: Stage 3 Execution
  • Completed On: 2026-02-22
  • Completed By: Codex
  • Completion Branch: feature/furniture-dal-001
  • Completion Commit: d637892
  • Lifecycle State: done