docs(blueprint-platform): add restaurant propagation guardrails
This commit is contained in:
parent
657f398dc7
commit
c1c9f05fbf
@ -145,6 +145,17 @@ Web repos additionally must:
|
||||
- validate using container-first test and build flow
|
||||
- document which lifecycle states and actions are visible to the role-specific UI
|
||||
|
||||
## Follow-Up Wave
|
||||
|
||||
Stage 48 validation exposed a runtime propagation gap that is now tracked by Stage 49.
|
||||
|
||||
Continue with:
|
||||
|
||||
- `plan/2026-03-31-s49-master-restaurant-propagation-and-runtime-alignment.md`
|
||||
- `docs/architecture/stage49-52-restaurant-propagation-guardrails.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Use Stage 49 when newly accepted orders do not yet appear consistently across customer, waiter, kitchen, and POS reads in the deployed demo.
|
||||
|
||||
## Known Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
This wave expands restaurant workflow realism, not the entire workspace architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
||||
# Stage 49-52 Restaurant Propagation Guardrails
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
This document turns the Stage 49 master plan into an execution guard for Stages 50-52.
|
||||
|
||||
Use it before starting any task in the following waves:
|
||||
|
||||
- Stage 50: restaurant propagation backend fixes
|
||||
- Stage 51: BFF read-model alignment and runtime rollout
|
||||
- Stage 52: demo reseed, redeploy, and public-host revalidation
|
||||
|
||||
## Stage Baseline
|
||||
|
||||
- Active master plan: `plan/2026-03-31-s49-master-restaurant-propagation-and-runtime-alignment.md`
|
||||
- Supporting review: `plan/2026-03-27-review-current-gap.md`
|
||||
- Current execution audit: `plan/2026-03-27-audit-task-execution.md`
|
||||
- Prior restaurant flow validation: `docs/consumption/restaurant-demo-flow-validation.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Default wave choices locked by Stage 49:
|
||||
|
||||
- runtime propagation realism before additional feature breadth
|
||||
- deployed restaurant behavior must match repo state before validation can pass
|
||||
- customer, waiter, kitchen, and POS reads must all reflect the same shared lifecycle records
|
||||
- deterministic seeds help walkthroughs, but they do not replace live mutation proof
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
The workspace remains locked to:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Blueprint -> BuildingBlock -> Domain -> DAL -> Service -> BFF
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Execution safety rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- no cross-repo `ProjectReference`
|
||||
- no repo may reference `legacy/`
|
||||
- BFF repos talk only to Service repos
|
||||
- Service repos must not depend on BFF repos
|
||||
- DAL repos must not depend on Service or BFF repos
|
||||
- runtime rollout must not skip a repo that materially changes lifecycle propagation
|
||||
- no summary-only projection may hide a successful shared-lifecycle mutation during Stage 52 validation
|
||||
|
||||
Before any implementation task is closed:
|
||||
|
||||
1. validate dependency direction against `rules/15-workspace-dependency-graph.md`
|
||||
2. validate no cross-repo `ProjectReference` was introduced
|
||||
3. confirm docs were updated in the same repo as the code change
|
||||
4. confirm any remaining demo limitation is documented explicitly
|
||||
|
||||
## Wave Dependency Order
|
||||
|
||||
The default flow for the Stage 50-52 task graph is:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `ARC-WORKSPACE-GUARD-1100`
|
||||
2. backend propagation:
|
||||
- `ARC-OPERATIONS-SERVICE-1110`
|
||||
- `ARC-KITCHEN-SERVICE-1110`
|
||||
3. BFF read-model alignment:
|
||||
- `ARC-CUSTOMER-ORDERS-BFF-1120`
|
||||
- `ARC-WAITER-FLOOR-BFF-1120`
|
||||
- `ARC-KITCHEN-OPS-BFF-1120`
|
||||
- `ARC-POS-TRANSACTIONS-BFF-1120`
|
||||
4. runtime rollout:
|
||||
- `ARC-RESTAURANT-RUNTIME-ROLLOUT-1130`
|
||||
5. deterministic reset and revalidation:
|
||||
- `ARC-RESTAURANT-DEMO-RESEED-1140`
|
||||
- `ARC-RESTAURANT-DEMO-FLOW-1150`
|
||||
|
||||
`DependsOn` remains authoritative when a task file is more specific than this summary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Propagation Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
A Stage 52 validation pass is only considered successful when the deployed public demo proves this flow:
|
||||
|
||||
1. a customer or waiter submits a new restaurant order
|
||||
2. the order becomes visible through customer detail or history
|
||||
3. the same order becomes visible to the kitchen board
|
||||
4. kitchen progression advances the shared lifecycle
|
||||
5. waiter-facing reads reflect the live progression
|
||||
6. POS exposes the resulting check only when lifecycle state makes it payable
|
||||
|
||||
If any step is still backed by seeded-only or summary-only data, the validation task stays open or blocked.
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Gates
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate A: Stage 50
|
||||
|
||||
Before Stage 51 starts:
|
||||
|
||||
- `operations-service` exposes lifecycle-backed detail and history reads
|
||||
- `kitchen-service` exposes ticket visibility for newly accepted orders
|
||||
- service docs describe any remaining bounded simplifications explicitly
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate B: Stage 51
|
||||
|
||||
Before Stage 52 starts:
|
||||
|
||||
- customer, waiter, kitchen, and POS BFF reads no longer depend on summary-only fallbacks for the core flow
|
||||
- the latest images are published and the deployed restaurant runtime is refreshed together
|
||||
- rollout docs distinguish repo state, image state, and deployed state clearly
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate C: Stage 52
|
||||
|
||||
Wave completion requires:
|
||||
|
||||
- public-host validation proves newly accepted orders flow across customer, waiter, kitchen, and POS
|
||||
- deterministic seed guidance remains aligned with the actual demo files
|
||||
- the Stage 48 blocked finding is explicitly resolved or narrowed with evidence
|
||||
- no stale `.repo-tasks/active` entries remain from Stage 49-52 work
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation And Comment Rules
|
||||
|
||||
Every implementation task in this wave must:
|
||||
|
||||
- update repo docs in the same change set
|
||||
- add meaningful comments where propagation logic or fallback removal is non-trivial
|
||||
- call out any remaining projection shortcuts clearly in code or docs
|
||||
- keep commit messages free of task, stage, or AI wording
|
||||
|
||||
Rollout and validation tasks additionally must:
|
||||
|
||||
- use the public auth host plus public demo hosts as the primary validation path
|
||||
- distinguish deterministic seed walkthroughs from live mutation proof
|
||||
- record any runtime drift that would invalidate public conclusions
|
||||
|
||||
## Known Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
This wave fixes restaurant propagation and runtime truthfulness, not the whole workspace roadmap.
|
||||
|
||||
That means:
|
||||
|
||||
- no new repositories in Stage 49-52
|
||||
- no auth provider redesign
|
||||
- no furniture expansion inside this wave unless restaurant propagation work proves a shared dependency
|
||||
- no UI-side workaround that bypasses the service and BFF boundaries
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
||||
@startuml
|
||||
skinparam monochrome true
|
||||
skinparam shadowing false
|
||||
skinparam packageStyle rectangle
|
||||
|
||||
title Stage 49-52 Restaurant Propagation Guardrails
|
||||
|
||||
rectangle "Stage 49\nPlanning Guard" as S49 {
|
||||
[ARC-WORKSPACE-GUARD-1100]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rectangle "Stage 50\nBackend Propagation" as S50 {
|
||||
[ARC-OPERATIONS-SERVICE-1110]
|
||||
[ARC-KITCHEN-SERVICE-1110]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rectangle "Stage 51\nBFF Alignment + Rollout" as S51 {
|
||||
[ARC-CUSTOMER-ORDERS-BFF-1120]
|
||||
[ARC-WAITER-FLOOR-BFF-1120]
|
||||
[ARC-KITCHEN-OPS-BFF-1120]
|
||||
[ARC-POS-TRANSACTIONS-BFF-1120]
|
||||
[ARC-RESTAURANT-RUNTIME-ROLLOUT-1130]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rectangle "Stage 52\nReset + Validation" as S52 {
|
||||
[ARC-RESTAURANT-DEMO-RESEED-1140]
|
||||
[ARC-RESTAURANT-DEMO-FLOW-1150]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[ARC-WORKSPACE-GUARD-1100] --> [ARC-OPERATIONS-SERVICE-1110]
|
||||
[ARC-WORKSPACE-GUARD-1100] --> [ARC-KITCHEN-SERVICE-1110]
|
||||
[ARC-OPERATIONS-SERVICE-1110] --> [ARC-KITCHEN-SERVICE-1110]
|
||||
|
||||
[ARC-OPERATIONS-SERVICE-1110] --> [ARC-CUSTOMER-ORDERS-BFF-1120]
|
||||
[ARC-OPERATIONS-SERVICE-1110] --> [ARC-WAITER-FLOOR-BFF-1120]
|
||||
[ARC-KITCHEN-SERVICE-1110] --> [ARC-KITCHEN-OPS-BFF-1120]
|
||||
[ARC-OPERATIONS-SERVICE-1110] --> [ARC-POS-TRANSACTIONS-BFF-1120]
|
||||
[ARC-KITCHEN-SERVICE-1110] --> [ARC-POS-TRANSACTIONS-BFF-1120]
|
||||
|
||||
[ARC-CUSTOMER-ORDERS-BFF-1120] --> [ARC-RESTAURANT-RUNTIME-ROLLOUT-1130]
|
||||
[ARC-WAITER-FLOOR-BFF-1120] --> [ARC-RESTAURANT-RUNTIME-ROLLOUT-1130]
|
||||
[ARC-KITCHEN-OPS-BFF-1120] --> [ARC-RESTAURANT-RUNTIME-ROLLOUT-1130]
|
||||
[ARC-POS-TRANSACTIONS-BFF-1120] --> [ARC-RESTAURANT-RUNTIME-ROLLOUT-1130]
|
||||
|
||||
[ARC-RESTAURANT-RUNTIME-ROLLOUT-1130] --> [ARC-RESTAURANT-DEMO-RESEED-1140]
|
||||
[ARC-RESTAURANT-DEMO-RESEED-1140] --> [ARC-RESTAURANT-DEMO-FLOW-1150]
|
||||
|
||||
note bottom
|
||||
Validation only passes when a newly accepted order propagates across
|
||||
customer, waiter, kitchen, and POS through the deployed public demo hosts.
|
||||
end note
|
||||
@enduml
|
||||
@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ This means the public SPAs now describe a connected flow more clearly, but the r
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommended Follow-Up
|
||||
|
||||
- Replace remaining static demo projections in restaurant read paths with lifecycle-backed projections sourced from the shared operations and kitchen stores.
|
||||
- Re-run Stage 48 validation after that propagation work lands.
|
||||
- Keep the seeded PostgreSQL data as deterministic walkthrough material, not as proof of the runtime mutation path.
|
||||
The blocked Stage 48 finding now rolls into Stage 49:
|
||||
|
||||
- `plan/2026-03-31-s49-master-restaurant-propagation-and-runtime-alignment.md`
|
||||
- `docs/architecture/stage49-52-restaurant-propagation-guardrails.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Execution focus:
|
||||
|
||||
- replace remaining static or summary-only restaurant read projections with lifecycle-backed projections sourced from the shared operations and kitchen stores
|
||||
- redeploy aligned restaurant runtime images before re-validating the public demo
|
||||
- keep the seeded PostgreSQL data as deterministic walkthrough material, not as proof of the runtime mutation path
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user